Starting Small or Going Big? Small Fund vs. SPVs for Emerging Managers

Venture capital is a dynamic and competitive field that presents both challenges and opportunities for emerging fund managers. One of the pivotal decisions they face is whether to start with a small fund, typically less than $10 million, or to explore sourcing and investing in deals through Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) with Limited Partners (LPs). Each approach has its merits and considerations, and the choice depends on various factors unique to the manager’s goals, capabilities, and market conditions. In this article, we will explore both options and help emerging VC fund managers make an informed decision.

The Small Fund Approach

a. Independence and Control: Starting with a small fund allows emerging managers to maintain more autonomy and control over investment decisions. This can be particularly appealing for those who want to implement their own investment thesis without the influence of external LPs.


b. Flexibility: A small fund offers flexibility in terms of investment focus and strategy. Emerging managers can experiment with different sectors or niches without the pressure of managing a large pool of capital.


c. Learning Opportunity: Managing a small fund can be an excellent learning experience. Emerging managers can refine their investment strategies, build a track record, and establish relationships within the industry before scaling up.


a. Limited Resources: A small fund typically has limited resources for conducting due diligence, sourcing deals, and providing support to portfolio companies. This can constrain the manager’s ability to access high-quality deals and support their investments effectively.


b. Scaling Difficulties: Transitioning from a small fund to a larger one can be challenging. As the fund grows, emerging managers may face difficulties in raising additional capital and expanding their team.


c. Risk of Being Overlooked: Small funds may not attract the attention of LPs or co-investors as much as larger, more established funds, potentially limiting their deal flow and networking opportunities.

The SPV Approach

a. Access to Larger Capital Pools: Sourcing and investing through SPVs allow emerging managers to tap into the capital of larger LPs. This provides access to more significant deal sizes and the ability to participate in high-value transactions.


b. Risk Sharing: By forming SPVs with LPs, emerging managers can share the risk of individual deals. This can be especially beneficial for those looking to mitigate the inherent risks associated with venture capital investments.


c. Networking Opportunities: Collaborating with LPs on SPVs can facilitate networking and relationship-building within the industry. It can also provide opportunities for mentorship and knowledge exchange.


a. Complexity: Managing SPVs involves legal, administrative, and compliance complexities that can be daunting for emerging managers. They may need to navigate intricate agreements and ensure compliance with regulations.


b. LP Expectations: LPs participating in SPVs may have specific expectations regarding deal selection, performance, and reporting. Emerging managers must effectively communicate and manage these expectations.


c. Diversification: Relying solely on SPVs may limit the manager’s ability to build a diversified portfolio, which is a common goal in venture capital to spread risk.

The Decision-Making Process

When deciding between starting with a small fund or leveraging SPVs, emerging VC fund managers should consider the following:

– Investment Thesis: Does the chosen approach align with your investment thesis and strategy? Ensure that your approach supports your long-term goals.

– Network and Relationships: Consider your existing network and relationships with LPs. If you have strong connections with potential LPs willing to engage in SPVs, this may be a viable path.

– Resources and Expertise: Assess your team’s capabilities, resources, and expertise. If you lack the resources to manage SPVs effectively, starting with a small fund might be more practical.

– Risk Tolerance: Evaluate your risk tolerance and the risk preferences of potential LPs. Some LPs may prefer the diversification offered by a small fund, while others may seek higher-risk, higher-reward opportunities through SPVs.

– Long-Term Vision: Consider your long-term vision for your venture capital career. Starting small and gradually scaling up may be suitable if you aim for a sustainable, long-term presence in the industry.


The decision to start with a small fund or leverage SPVs as an emerging VC fund manager is not one-size-fits-all. It depends on individual circumstances, goals, and market conditions. Both approaches have their merits and challenges. The key is to align your choice with your investment thesis, network, resources, and long-term vision. Remember that success in venture capital often hinges on adaptability and the ability to evolve as market dynamics change. Whichever path you choose, the journey will be a valuable learning experience that can shape your career in this exciting and ever-evolving field.

Ready to set up an Angel, Venture, Founder or Holding SPV?

At Auptimate, we make it easy to design, launch and operate market-leading SPVs online for a fixed, low price. If you’re ready to start your next SPV, hit the “Launch” button at the top of this page.  Or get in touch with us at and one of our experts will be more than happy to help.